Is it Worth It? Tagging & Social Bookmarking?
I'm still on the fence on this one, but may give it a shot...just so I'm not talking out my rear end (since I haven't tried it). Still, in my few years online, I've come to value my instinct and experience when it comes to assessing new online opportunities.
I'm talking about tagging on your blogs. You know those keyword links you see on blogs to Technorati or wherever. Here's an example from my techy friend Lynette Chandler's blog:
Personally, I think these links are a distraction...particularly to your non-tech savvy readers. For Lynette's market, it may be appropriate, but if you don't reach blogging geeks, you'll likely send your readers clicking through to all these places and they won't really know why.
I note that my friend Lynn Terry says we should stop the fear about linking out when it comes to blogs. I agree, but I believe in linking with a true purpose that is useful to your visitor.
Plus, a tag is just a temporary measure to get some traffic from a blog search site. From what I can see, if you keep these links on your site for a long time, they'll be helping Technorati (or whomever you're linking to) and not likely doing you much good - especially for popular topics.
From reports of other people using the tags, the extra short-term traffic doesn't seem to be worth cluttering up my blog for. And besides, it's tough to measure if the extra traffic came from the tag or just because you pinged the web logs...and pinging doesn't create any reader distractions.
A word of caution, though...and again, this is purely my speculation...is that I expect that this method will lose it's effectiveness. People are gearing up to teach people about tagging and you can expect plenty of hyped up products. And just like any traffic generation method that gets pumped up, it will be abused by people who don't believe in adding value to the blogosphere, but prefer to produce garbage for a quick buck. And when it's abused, the people who created the technology have to make changes and the original method will no longer be so effective.
But back to the topic...
Through a discussion on the private Reese Report forum, Charles, posted a little video about using tagging, if you're not familiar with it. I asked Charles if he was going to perhaps show a more meaningful example because I believe the same results could have been achieved without tagging Technorati. A simple, automated ping would have been sufficient with his fictional topic. I'll let you know what he says. He does also have a free newsletter that I've taken him up on (the link as the bottom of the video page)...and we'll see what other information he can provide us with.
Along the same lines of tagging, my friend Lynette also has an interesting article on social bookmarking. Near the end of the article, you'll see that Lynette has requested some help for an experiment. I'm willing to help her on this experiment, but I'm waiting for more results before I move ahead on my own.
I'm also interested in learning more and hearing your experiences...so share them please. :-)
Edited to Add:
I thought I should post this from the Technorati site:
So you don't really have to link to Technorati, but that still doesn't seem to eliminate the excessive links on a blog. Or if you're blog supports categories, then you can use your categories as your tags. But how many categories does a focused blog really need?
*Source: http://www.technorati.com/help/tags.html
I'm talking about tagging on your blogs. You know those keyword links you see on blogs to Technorati or wherever. Here's an example from my techy friend Lynette Chandler's blog:
Personally, I think these links are a distraction...particularly to your non-tech savvy readers. For Lynette's market, it may be appropriate, but if you don't reach blogging geeks, you'll likely send your readers clicking through to all these places and they won't really know why.
I note that my friend Lynn Terry says we should stop the fear about linking out when it comes to blogs. I agree, but I believe in linking with a true purpose that is useful to your visitor.
Plus, a tag is just a temporary measure to get some traffic from a blog search site. From what I can see, if you keep these links on your site for a long time, they'll be helping Technorati (or whomever you're linking to) and not likely doing you much good - especially for popular topics.
From reports of other people using the tags, the extra short-term traffic doesn't seem to be worth cluttering up my blog for. And besides, it's tough to measure if the extra traffic came from the tag or just because you pinged the web logs...and pinging doesn't create any reader distractions.
A word of caution, though...and again, this is purely my speculation...is that I expect that this method will lose it's effectiveness. People are gearing up to teach people about tagging and you can expect plenty of hyped up products. And just like any traffic generation method that gets pumped up, it will be abused by people who don't believe in adding value to the blogosphere, but prefer to produce garbage for a quick buck. And when it's abused, the people who created the technology have to make changes and the original method will no longer be so effective.
But back to the topic...
Through a discussion on the private Reese Report forum, Charles, posted a little video about using tagging, if you're not familiar with it. I asked Charles if he was going to perhaps show a more meaningful example because I believe the same results could have been achieved without tagging Technorati. A simple, automated ping would have been sufficient with his fictional topic. I'll let you know what he says. He does also have a free newsletter that I've taken him up on (the link as the bottom of the video page)...and we'll see what other information he can provide us with.
Along the same lines of tagging, my friend Lynette also has an interesting article on social bookmarking. Near the end of the article, you'll see that Lynette has requested some help for an experiment. I'm willing to help her on this experiment, but I'm waiting for more results before I move ahead on my own.
I'm also interested in learning more and hearing your experiences...so share them please. :-)
Edited to Add:
I thought I should post this from the Technorati site:
So you don't really have to link to Technorati, but that still doesn't seem to eliminate the excessive links on a blog. Or if you're blog supports categories, then you can use your categories as your tags. But how many categories does a focused blog really need?
*Source: http://www.technorati.com/help/tags.html
7 Comments:
I agree, tags and social bookmarking tools should probably be used mainly with a tech savvy audience. I don't use them on any of my websites or blogs. Heck, the term 'blog' is still a mystery to many average Joes and Janes. ;)
Alice, thanks for tips. I just get done creating my own blog. I will apply some of the tips to my blog...
I'm firmly on the fence on this one too: we've tried using technorati tags on a pro-blog we've developed but found the experiment hasn't worked out. For starters the Technorati service is not really reliable enough. Even though we've pinged them and used tags we haven't featured regularly enough on our two key tags: Sweden and Stockholm. Weird.
We took the decision today to stop using the tags from tomorrow onwards just to see what happens. I suspect there will be no changes to traffic as we've not seen more than one or two hits a day come thru Technorati. Plus even tracking our key word searches thru the RSS feeds just turns up massess of spammed content.
Appreciated your thoughts on the matter.
I have been looking into social bookmarking and trying to understand it as well. Thank you for the information.
Hey, I found you page in the search result of technorati! Does that mean T&P is working? I mean, it's not the "usual" search engine people use for locating stuffs... so I'm still wondering how this method will bring traffic? Perhaps it helps in getting website indexed via bleeding from such a high PR site such as Technorati, but other than that, how else will this help?
That's funny copycatmarketing. That is exactly my point. I don't use tags and I also agree the traffic from Technorati, etc. isn't worth cluttering up your blog for.
Thanks for dropping by!
Some interesting observations here, Alice - great post! I am still testing things out on my end, but the results are good so far.
I consider tags to be reference or resource links to discussions/articles on same or similar topics. Done right, this can be a good addition for your readers. But I also agree on your point of 'cluttering the page'.
That makes me think that it might be worthwhile to better define the tags I have at the end of my own posts. Perhaps with a line like "links to similar discussions" or something along those lines. The word "Tags" is meaningless to most readers, I would imagine.
Again, great post! This will be an interesting topic to follow over the next 6-12 months.
Lynn Terry
Post a Comment
<< Home